在中国 这个同任何行当都一样
博主 对 cuiyi.crazy 的回复: 2008-04-02 00:49:41
也许也是道理之一

做事层面，你的这些理论和愿望是空的

解释现象，更多的是创造性，需要看到别人没看到的，而不是捡到现成的来堆砌

支持继续钻研，而且是真的钻研，把书读透了，同时请别在糊弄大家了

愿望不等于真实情况
博主 对 顾城 的回复: 2008-03-18 23:13:30
我看不到别人没看到的，只能把很多人看到的再“堆砌”起来，本来如此。

至于空还是不空，那就看做的结果罢。

引用一项研究，CMC between East Asians and North Americans。这项研究的出处是这里：

Ma, R. (1996). Computer-mediated conversations as a new dimension of intercultural communication between East Asian and North American college students. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives [Volume 39 of the series Pragmatics and Beyond New Series] (pp. 173-185). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins。

在这项研究中，得出了五个命题：

Those who engage in intercultural computer-mediated conversations regularly are better informed about the culture of their communication partners than are those who do not about the same culture.

Those who engage in computer-mediated intercultural communication are less likely to adapt to each other’s cultural rules than those who engage in FTF communication.

Both East Asians and North Americans tend to be more direct in computer-mediated conversations than in FTF conversations.

Both East Asians and North Americans tend to show greater self-disclosure in computer-mediated conversations than in FTF conversations.

Both East Asians and North Americans perceive computer-mediated intercultural communication as a more egalitarian and information-oriented experience than FTF intercultural communication.

这五个命题或可解释，为什么IM在中国如此流行，而在美国却不是那么流行。